To cut or not to cut?

[Aurora Moon]

0

How is a circumcision not ever to be considered medical, AM?

When it's clear that the baby has a healthy penis, one that isn't prone to infection ever in his life so far?

I've dated both men who had circumcised penises and those who weren't cut. and I honestly saw no difference between the two, espeically when they're erect. They all basically look the same when erect... the only difference is that the uncut's penis has a tiny bit of loose skin when flaccid and that's it. and all the uncut men I dated told me that they never had any infection issue.

so again, it's that whole 1% getting infected while the 99% of uncut men doesn't have any issues like that. why insist that all boys get circumcised when it's only a tiny minority of infants that gets infected? after all, all good parents know how to use soap and how to wash genitals properly to prevent that from happening. and they can teach their kids to wash down there. it's not that hard.

The only time it would ever be a medical issue is if it got infected and had to be removed, just like with tonsils.

I don't know why that would be so hard to understand.